countries belonging to the Englishman, so the abandonment of their country homes by many families that were identified with them for centuries has weakened one of the mainsprings of family feeling. Squireens and yeomanry have been bought out, or have left, because they found themselves overshadowed by rich neighbours with whom it was impossible to compete, and whom it was not pleasant to defer to. Associations have been destroyed that can never be renewed. Even, however, if all the representatives of the old families could be replaced, England and half a dozen modern countries are getting so crowded that their populations are forced to live for the most part in towns. Some of the disadvantages of this change have already been considered. It need only be noticed here that it is bound to destroy the religion of the homestead; and though that may only be a gross form of human weakness which induces men to linger where the cradle of the race was laid, where generation after generation has been committed to consecrated dust, where the very meadows and woods are instinct with memories of ancestral life, we are so constituted that our very weakness will sometimes lend intensity to our loves. May it be that as husband and wife, parent and children, master and servant, family and home lose more and more of their ancient and intense significance, the old imperfect feelings will be transmuted into love for fatherland. CHAPTER VI THE DECAY OF CHARACTER The question postulated is whether the changes that increase the influence of the State may not diminish the sphere of individual energy. The inquiry is complicated by the consideration that a strong motive such as the love of power or fame-may stimulate energy, even where circumstances are most unfavourable, as in ancient Athens. - Moreover, the Church and Army develop individuality in some ways, though they crush it in others. Religious influence has been stronger than ethical in past times. What then will be the result if the State takes the place of the Church in organising society, and if science supersedes it in criticism of the past and in divination of the future? - A tendency to disbelieve in the miraculous may leave unaffected the faith that there is a moral government and foreordering of the world. It need not therefore destroy a temperate belief in the efficacy of prayer. - The belief in a future state is likely to be less positively held. These changes, though they may leave religion in society as an appreciable element, are bound to impair its influence over the masses, which was once great and good.The austere tradition of Puritan family life, with its strength and its shortcomings, has gone for ever, and is replaced by a sensuous, genial, and fibreless society. --Women are bound to be profoundly influenced by the changes that are making them more and more like men, as they are exempted from tutelage, encouraged to stand alone, and induced to occupy themselves with pursuits hitherto esteemed masculine. - State education and State military service are bound to render the intellect more mechanical and to sap the energy that is developed by competition. - The right of public meeting is likely to be limited in the future, and this will interfere with the power to give instantaneous body and form to new thoughts by the contagion of popular feeling. The immigration of aliens in large numbers is likely to be restricted everywhere, as also the right of individuals to practise their professions or trades in a foreign country. This will add enormously to the power an administration now has over those who criticise or oppose it. Exile will mean ruin. It is anticipated by some that the future has in reserve for us great scientific discoveries which will at least elevate the mind, and which may perhaps reconcile reason and faith. - This is to assume that doctrines which aim at spiritualising the character can be reduced to the condition of problems that satisfy the intellect. They would lose all that is distinctive in the process. The most that can be said is, that religion will gain when its teaching does not outrage possibility, and science by learning that it is not allsufficient. Beyond this there is reason to suppose that science has done her greatest and most suggestive work. There is nothing now left for her but to fill in details. Certain forms of literature, such as the epic, the drama, the pastoral, and the satire appear to be already exhausted. The real genius of the age takes a lyrical form, and is feeble and incongruous when it attempts any other.-Moreover, life has been toned down, so that there is much less wealth of strong incident and effective situation than was the case anciently. -Again, when work has been perfectly done the artist does not care to attempt it again, and the world will not tolerate reproductions. Topics are being exhausted. This, however, will tell after a time even more against lyrical poetry, because the single mood or situation is less capable of variety than the human character. The novel is not likely to replace poetry for work of the highest kind. History, however, which is perpetually accumulating fresh material, may furnish practically inexhaustible material to minds of the highest order. - Criticism has only recently begun to exist. It is likely to exercise a growing influence over all matters of science as observation and thought are accumulated. -While, however, there is a comparative certainty about the judgments of science, the criticism of taste is apt to be very variable, as if fixed canons could not be applied with precision to living men. - Criticism generally errs by being too eulogistic, or, at least, disproportionately eulogistic. As, however, it is likely that the classical and best models will be discarded as contemporary literature grows upon us, criticism will suffer, because its standards will be impaired. Although the results of science admit of being communicated in good style, science is passing so much into the hands of experts that its familiar interpretation will cease to be needed. -Oratory is likely to be reduced more and more to debating and to the skilful enhancement of commonplace. - It seems probable that as the special correspondent is superseding the traveller, so journalism will absorb more and more of the world's practical intellect; even the abstract thinker finding it advantageous to communicate his ideas through a newspaper with large circulation. But the journalist writes for the day, and his best work is only of ephemeral value. It is conceivable that the duration of life will be prolonged, and that the chances of health will be enormously increased by scientific improvements. It would seem as if this ought to increase self-confidence and energy. A world predominantly of old people will be a world of more stable political order and greater efficiency of exact thought. - On the other hand, it will be a world with less adventure and energy, less brightness and hope. Neither will ambition be so powerful a motive of action as when a single man-Caesar or Chatham-could initiate and carry out a policy of his own. - Again, it is possible that the most important and sensational changes have already been effected. -Fame is perhaps a little less capricious than of old; but it is less valuable from being more widely distributed. This will be especially true of literary fame, as some kinds of literature are dying out, and the competition in those that survive will elicit many candidates for distinction. - The limitations imposed by State Socialism on private enterprise are never likely to be so far-reaching as to preclude money-making and destroy the passion for wealth.-Wealth, however, will be valued as the source of power and ostentation, not as the means of founding a family. We are realising our highest dreams, and they mean a more stable and equable order, less aspiration, and less energy. -The decay of vital power in the race does not mean that it will become extinct; but that it will gradually lose interest in all but the day's needs. It is inspiriting to remember that the world has passed through stormy times before, and has been depressed, and yet the results have been better than expectation. As we can trace advance hitherto, why should it not be continued in the future? - The faith in progress is based upon an assumption as to the Divine purpose in creation, which is not only gratuitous, but opposed to facts. - All that can be said is, that if we are passing into the old age of humanity we may at least bear the burden laid upon us with dignity. So far an attempt has been made to show that the races of the world are approaching a stationary condition as regards territorial limits between Aryan and others, what we call the higher being confined for practical purposes to a part of the Temperate Zone; that democracy is likely to find its consummation in State Socialism; and that certain notable influences, such as attachment to a Church, municipal feeling, and even family feeling, are likely to become less and less important as factors in the constitution of society. The great possible motors of action, if these changes actually take place, will be the sense of duty to the State, and the self-reliance of individual character. The patriotic feeling is likely to be enhanced by a sense of the great services which the State will render in the new order; by the habit of military discipline which universal service in the ranks will create; and by the mere fact that as the feelings lose a sufficient object in Church, city, or family, they will tend to concentrate themselves upon the fatherland. It remains to consider what effect the new importance of the State may have upon personal energy and independence of thought. The strength of the State can hardly be more than the sum of strength in its individual members; and it is at least conceivable that we may get political organisations which are more complete than have ever yet been-that is, which attempt more and do more-but which are yet deficient in the spiritual reserve which an older and more imperfect society possessed in the initiative and resource of its members. To take examples from history, let us assume-merely as a hypothesis that modern society is tending more and more to the form of society that prevailed under the Incas, and that such men as Drake and Frobisher, Clive and Warren Hastings, are likely to become rare and disappear. The initial perplexity of such an inquiry is, that it is extremely difficult to avoid the conclusion that energy of character may assert itself in certain epochs with apparent disregard of political institutions. Athens in its best time was a country in which the limitations of originality in thought or action were enormous. To be suspected of entertaining new views about religion was dangerous, and impiety was charged against statesmen like Pericles and Alcibiades, philosophers like Anaxagoras and Socrates, as effectively as if they had been statesmen of the seventeenth century in Europe. be wealthy was to be suspected of peculation, and to be powerful was to invite ostracism. The general To |