IMPERFECT TENSE.

Indefinite. This form of the imperfect tense represents action past and finished, and often with the precise time undefined : as," Alexander conquered the Persians; Scipio was as virtuous as brave."

Definite. This form represents an action as taking place and unfinished, in some specified period of past time: as, "I was standing at the door, when the procession passed."

PERFECT TENSE.

Indefinite. This form of the perfect tense represents an action completely past, and often at no great distance, but not specified: as, "I have accomplished my design;" "I have read the History of England."

Definite. This form represents an action as just finished: as "I have been reading a History of the revolution;" "I have been studying hard to-day."

PLUPERFECT TENSE.

Indefinite. This form of the pluperfect tense, expresses an action which was past at or before some other past time specified: as, "He had received the news before the messenger arrived."

Deffinite. This form denotes an action to be just past, at or before another past time specified: as, "I had been waiting an hour, when the messenger arrived."

FIRST FUTURE TENSE.

Indefinite. This form of the first future, simply gives notice of an event to happen hereafter: as, "Charles will go to London ;" "I think we shall have a fine season.' Definite. This form expresses an action, which is to take place, and be unfinished, at a specified future time: as, "He will be preparing for a visit, at the time you arrive."

SECOND FUTURE TENSE.

Indefinite. This form of the second future, denotes an action which will be past at a future time specified: as, "They will have accomplished their purpose, at the time they proposed."

Definite. This form represents an action, which will be just past at a future specified time: as, "The scholars will have been studying an hour, when the tutor comes to examine them."

The student will observe, that, in this scheme, all the definite tenses are formed by the participle of the present tense, and the substantive verb to be.

There are other modes of expressing future time: as, "I am going to write ;" "I am about to write." These have been called the Inceptive future, as they note the commencement of an action, or an intention to commence an action without delay.

The substantive verb followed by a verb in the infinitive mood, forms another method of indicating future time: as "Ferdinand is to command the army." "On the subject of style, I am afterwards to discourse." "Eneas went in search of the seat of an empire, which was, one day, to govern the world." The latter expression has been called a future past : that is, past as to the narrator; but future as to the event, at the time specified.

From the preceding representation of the different tenses, it appears, that each of them has its distinct and peculiar province; and that though some of them may sometimes be used promiscuously, or substituted one for another, in cases where great accuracy is not required, yet there is a real and essential difference in their meaning. It is also evident, that the English language contains the six tenses which we have enumerated. Grammarians who limit the number to two, or at most to three, namely, the present, the imperfect, and the future, do not reflect that the English verb is mostly composed of principal and auxiliary; and that these several parts constitute one verb. Either the English language has no regular future tense, or its future is composed of the auxiliary and the principal verb. If the latter be admitted, then the auxiliary and principal united, constitute a tense, in one instance; and from reason and analogy, may doubtless do so, in others, in which minuter divisions of time are necessary, or useful. reason can be assigned for not considering this case, as other cases, in which a whole is regarded as composed of several parts, or of principal and adjuncts? There is nothing heterogeneous in the parts: and precedent, analogy, utility, and even necesity, authorize the union.

What

In support of this opinion we have the authority of eminent grammarians; in particular, that of Dr. Beattie. "Some writers," says the doctor, "will not allow any thing to be a tense, but what, in one inflected word, expresses an affirmation with time; for that those parts of the verb are not proper ly called tenses, which assume that appearance, by means of auxiliary words. At this rate, we should have, in English two tenses only, the present and the past in the active verb, and in the passive no tenses at all. But this is a needless

nicety; and, if adopted, would introduce confusion into the grammatical art. If amaveram be a tense, why should not amatus fueram? If I heard, be a tense, I did hear, I have heard, and I shall hear, must be equally entitled to that appellation." The proper form of a tense in the Greek and Latin tongues, is certainly that which it has in the grammars of those languages. But in the Greek and Latin grammars we uniformly find, that some of the tenses are formed by variations of the principal verb; and others, by the additon of a helping verb. It is, therefore, indisputable, that the principal verb or rather its participle, and an auxiliary, constitute a regular tense in the Greek and Latin languages. This point being established, we may, doubtless, apply it to English verbs; and extend the principle as far as convenience, and the idiom of our language require.

If it should be said, that, on the same ground that a participle and auxiliary are allowed to form a tense, and the verb is to be conjugated accordingly, the English noun and pronoun ought to be declined at large, with articles and prepositions; we must object to the inference. Such a mode of declension is not adapted to our language. This we think has been already proved. It is also confessedly inapplicable to the learned languages. Where then is the grammatical inconsistency, or the want of conformity to the principles of analogy, in making some tenses of the English verb to consist of principal and auxiliary; and the cases of English nouns, chiefly in their termination? The argument from analogy, instead of militating against us, appears to confirm and establish our position. See pages 66-68. Sections 8 and 9 of this chapter, and the 19th Rule of Syntax-Note 8.

We shall close these remarks on the tenses, with a few observations, extracted from the ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA. They are worth the student's attention, as a part of them applies, not only to our views of the tenses, but to many other parts of the work."Harris [by way of hypothesis] has enumerated no fewer than twelve tenses. Of this enumeration we can by no means approve for without entering into a minute examination of it, nothing can be more obvious, than that his inceptive present, "I am going to write," is a future tense; and his completive present," I have written," a past tense. But, as was before observed of the classification of words we cannot help being of opinion, that, to take the tenses as they are commonly received, and endeavour to ascertain their nature and their differences, is a much more useful exercise, as well

* See pages 44, 45.

as more proper for a work of this kind, than to raise, as might easily be raised, new theories on the subject."*

SECTION 6.

The Conjugation of the auxiliary verbs TO HAVE and TO BE. THE Conjugation of a verb, is the regular combination and arrangement of its several numbers, persons, moods, and tenses.

The Conjugation of an active verb is styled the ACTIVE VOICE; and that of a passive verb, the PAS

SIVE VOICE.

The auxiliary and active verb TO HAVE, is conjugated in the following manner.

*The following criticism affords an additional support to the author's system of the tenses, &c.

Under the head of Etymology, the author of this grammar judiciously adheres to the natural symplicity of the Euglish language, without embarrassing the learner with distiuctions peculiar to the Latin tongue. The difficult subject of the Tenses, is clearly explained; and with less incumbrance of technical phraseology, than in most other grama rs." Analytical Review. Ye is nearly obso

lete

Hath is now used only in poetry, and on very serious occasions. ↑ See next page-note marked thus [*].

The imperative mood is not strictly entitled to three persons. The command is always addressed to the second person, not to the first or third. For when we say, "Let me have," ""Let him, or let them have," the meaning and construction are, do thou, or do ye, let me, him, or them have. In philosophical strictness, both number and person might be entirely excluded from every verb. They are, in fact, the

The terms which we have adopted, to designate the three past tenses, may not be exactly significant of their nature and distinctious. But as they are used by grammarians in general, and have an established authority; and, especially, as the meaning attached to each of them, and their different significations, have been carefully explained; we presume that no solid objection can be made to the use of terms, so generally approved, and so explicitly defined. See pages 30, 31.

+ If such sentences should be rigorously examined, the Imperative will appear to cou sist merely in the word let. See Directions for Parsing.