The Limits of Voice: Montaigne, Schlegel, KafkaThis work contains an analysis of literary experience as a case of aesthetic experience. In response to the questions raised by the rise of subjectivity, it argues that though traces of subjectivity can be identified in the writings of Montaigne, only Kant provided the necessary philosophical legitimation of subjectivity. Schlegel's work is considered as both the beginning and culmination of philosophical aesthetics while Kafka's writing is seen as a fictional work which, without taking itself as Truth, refrains from affirming any Truth, and questions Truths as fictions. |
Contents
ence of the Self and Mark of Criticity 64 In the Way of a Synthesis | 68 |
Critic of Romanticism 107 Schiller and the Aestheticization of Art | 115 |
A Final Rectification 170 The End of the Critical | 177 |
Before the | 183 |
A Religious Novel? 274 The Desubstantialization of the | 303 |
325 | |
337 | |
Common terms and phrases
accused aesthetic experience aesthetic judgment aestheticization affirmation already analysis autonomy basis beautiful become Brod Castle character characterized concept consequence conservatism criticism Critique Czech deterritorialization discourse effect emphasis epistemological skepticism essay examine exemplum existence expression fact father feeling Fichte fictional force formulation fragment Franz Kafka free indirect speech Friedrich Schlegel genre historical human idea ideal imagination implies individual subject interpretation Jewish Jews Joseph Joseph K Kafka Kant Kant's Kantian language legitimation letter literary literature logic Max Brod means Menocchio ment mimesis modern Montaigne Montaigne's moral nature Novalis novel object observation passage Penal Colony philosophical plane poetic poetry poiesis portrait position possible Prague present principle question reader reading reason reflection relation religious Romanticism Schiller Schlegel 1967c Schmitt seems seen semantic sense social society things thought tion Trial truth undecidability underscore understanding unity values whereas writing