The Triumph of the Goddess: The Canonical Models and Theological Visions of the Devī-Bhāgavata Purāna

Front Cover
SUNY Press, Jan 1, 1990 - Religion - 327 pages

The authors of the Devī-Bhāgavata Purāna endeavored to demonstrate the superiority of the Devī over competing masculine deities, and to articulate in new ways the manifold nature of the Goddess. Brown's book sets out to examine how the Purana pursues these ends. The Devī-Bhāgavata employs many ancient myths and motifs from older masculine theologies, incorporating them into a thoroughly "feminized" theological framework. The text also seeks to supplant older "masculine" canonical authorities. Part I of Brown's study explores these strategies by focusing on the Purana's self-conscious endeavor to supersede the famous VaisBhagavata Purana.

The Devī-Bhāgavata also re-envisions older mythological traditions about the Goddess, especially those in the first great Sanskritic glorification of the Goddess, the Devi-Mahatmya. Brown shows in Part II how this re-envisioning process transforms the <i>Devī </i> from a primarily martial and erotic goddess into the World-Mother of infinite compassion.

Part III examines the Devi Gita, the philosophical climax of the Purana modeled upon the Bhagavad Gita. The Devi Gita, while affirming that ultimate reality is the divine Mother, avows that her highest form as consciousness encompasses all gender, thereby suggesting the final triumph of the Goddess. It is not simply that She is superior to the male gods, but rather that She transcends Her own sexuality without denying it.

 

Contents

IV
17
V
34
VI
53
VII
81
VIII
132
IX
155
X
179
XI
201
XIII
213
XIV
219
XV
226
XVI
227
XVII
233
XVIII
295
XIX
311
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 3 - does not argue that ultimate reality is feminine, nor does it propose it as a deliberate alternative to understanding ultimate reality as masculine. Feminine motifs are, of course, pervasive of the DM. But insofar as the DM is concerned to ‘demonstrate' anything, it is that ultimate reality is really ultimate, not that it is feminine.”¿
Page xii - be replaced with an existential concern, a wrestling with the implications for oneself. The very suggestion that truth is not an inert and impersonal observable but that truth means truth for me, for you, is challenging. Let us face the
Page xv - Acknowledgments I would like to thank the following individuals for their help and

About the author (1990)

C. MacKenzie Brown is Professor of Religion, Trinity University.

Bibliographic information