Page images
PDF
EPUB

1830. Dec. 11 A grand aurora from 7 to 12 P. M. in England,

and still more so in the State of New York, America-Howard, vol. iii. page 373. Ph.

Mag. vol. ix. pages 159, 394. Br. vol. v. page 263

12 Another aurora nearly equally fine and extensive in Europe and America. Same ref.

13 & 14 Faint aurora at Gosport and Bedford-Ph. Mag. vol. ix. page 159 and 395

[blocks in formation]

An aurora, Ackworth, Yorkshire-H. vol. iii.

page 373

A fine aurora, Manch. Gosport-Ph. Mag.
Kendal-Br. vol. vi.

vol. ix. page 159.
page 184

An aurora-Bl.

6 An aurora, Manchester, Gosport-Ph. Mag.

7

[blocks in formation]

From sunset till morning, one of the finest auroræ ever seen; England, Scotland, Paris, Brussels-H. vol. iii. page 373. Ph. Mag. vol. ix. pages 127, 151, 233. Scotsman Newspaper, &c. J. J. vol. x. page 381

8 An aurora-Bl.

page 235.

page 395

Gosport-Ph. Mag. vol. ix.
Bedford-Ph. Mag. vol. ix.

10

An aurora-Bl.

11 An aurora at Kendal-Br. vol. vi. page 184

21

Bedford-Ph. Mag. vol. ix. page 395
Gosport-Ph. Mag. vol. ix. page 239

An aurora at Manchester, at 10 P. M.-Mr.
Burton

Feb. 11 An aurora at Manchester-Bl.

14 An aurora-Bl.

March 6

A low aurora-Bl.

Also Lancaster Gazette

17 An aurora-Lancaster Gazette

7

A fine aurora at 7 P. M.-Bl. Also at Gosport

from 7 to 10-Ph. Mag. vol. ix. page 399

1831. March 8 An aurora from 11 P. M. to 1 A. M. Manchester

11

[blocks in formation]

An aurora, Manchester-Bl. Marsden, Lan

[blocks in formation]

from 8 P. M. to i A. M.; fine and elevated-Ph. Mag. vol. ix. page 466

20 A faint aurora, Gosport, low from 10 to 12 P. M. -Ph. Mag. vol. ix. page 466

23 An aurora at 11 P. M. Manchester-Mr. Burton May 30 A slight aurora in the North at 10 P. M. Gosport-Ph. Mag. vol. x. page 79

Sept. 12 An aurora, or horizontal light, Manchester-Bl. A faint aurora from 8 to 10 P. M., Gosport-Ph. Mag. vol. x. page 398

Oct. 29

1832. Jan. 27

Sept. 23

An aurora, or horizontal light, Manchester-Bl. From 10 to 11 P. M. an aurora, reaching about 16° alt., Gosport-Ph. Mag. vol. x. page 571

An aurora, Manchester-Bl.

An auroral arch, and streamers, Mr. R. Potter,
Smedley Hall, Manchester-Lond. & Edin.
Ph. Mag. & Journal of Science, vol. ii.
page 233

Nov. 1 Evening, luminous N., Manchester. Aurora at
Bradford, Burnley, Kendal, &c.-See the

4

Dcc. 21

above Mag. & Jour. vol. ii. page 239

Aurora at Lincoln-London Paper

At 7 P. M. an auroral arch, Newcastle-uponTyne, Mr. R. Potter-See above Journal, page 233

G G

1833. Feb. 11 An aurora-Mr. Peter Clare, Manchester An aurora-Bl.

18

19 An aurora 11 P. M.-Mr. Hadfield, Manchester An aurora at Cambridge-Phil. M. Lond. & Edin. vol. ii. page 315

Mar. 13

21

A luminous aurora, Manchester-Phil. M. Lond. & Edin. vol. iii. page 422. Seen in Scot

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

An aurora, Greta-bridge-Mr. John Phillips,

York

An aurora at Bury, &c.-R.

A fine aurora from 8 to 11, Manchester. Very
extensively seen in Great Britain and Ire-
land-Phil. M. Lond. & Edin. vol. iii.
page 461

An aurora inferior to the one last night, Manch.
A most splendid aurora, seen throughout Great
Britain and Ireland, and reported in most
of the Newspapers

An aurora at Catteric-bridge, Yorkshire-R.
An aurora (supposed) seen about noon at Ken-
dal-Kendal Paper

1814. Sept. 11

OMITTED.

A fine auroral arch in Great Britain and Ireland

-A. P. vol. iv. page 362

On the height of the Aurora Borealis.

EVER Since the phenomena of the aurora borealis have been observed, the height and distance of the meteor have naturally been subjects of inquiry. Yet, to the no small discredit of Meteorology, there are, at this day, some persons who hold the height of the aurora to be one thousand miles, others who hold that one thousand feet may be nearer the truth, and others who think its height may, in particular instances, be the one or the other of these extremes, as well as all the intermediate heights.

Some excuse for this diversity of opinion may be adduced, from the circumstance that the phenomena are subject to long periods of intermission. In some periods, they are rarely seen for great part of an age; in other periods, they may be viewed thirty, forty, or fifty times in each successive year, as was the case forty years since, in Great Britain; but when they do occur, it is only one time in ten perhaps in which the phenomena excite universal attention, and afford such data as are more particularly useful for obtaining their height above the earth's surface.

M. DE MAIRAN, a member of the Royal Academy of Paris, in the beginning of the last century, has left us a history of the aurora borealis, from the first records of it up to the year 1732. From this, it appears that sixty-six observations had been

made, or rather recorded, betwixt the years 500 and 1716. Since 1716, there has scarcely been a year without a number of these appearances. He records one hundred and sixty-three, which happened between 1716 and 1732. In 1728, there were thirty; in 1724, only two. Dr. THOMSON, in the 4th Vol. of the Annals of Philosophy, page 427, has given an article on the aurora borealis. In this, we find a table of the heights of several auroræ, as estimated by the observers of the last century, most of which are taken from a work of BERGMAN, rarely to be met with I believe in this country. Their heights are very discordant, no doubt owing chiefly to the want of correct data for the calculation. They seem mostly to have estimated the heights as being some aliquot part of the earth's radius, as t, t, t, t, or r of the same; that is, from one thousand miles to three hundred, and under. Notwithstanding this, the brilliant auroræ that occur in these times, have just the same appearances as those which were observed a century ago; and the description which Dr. HALLEY gave of the one in 1716, would equally apply to any grand display we have had since, either in this country, or any part of Europe. There is not then any reason, from the optical appearances, to conclude that the aurora are materially variable in their heights at different times and places.

Though the Astronomers and Mathematicians of the last century failed in ascertaining the exact height of the aurora, they had abundant proof it

« PreviousContinue »