...

year was five silver and 1900 copper coins. These are, of course, generally of the same description and types as those previously referred to (p. 80). My stay at Jalálábad was, during the season of the year, unfavourable for the collection of coins; yet, independently of those extracted from topes, were procured 248 copper coins, among which two or three are novel ones, to be noted in their place.

Subsequent to my arrival in Kábul, I purchased in the bázár there, six gold, 176 silver, and 142 copper coins: some of these are important ones. I had also the fortune to secure a large parcel of silver Bactrians, a deposit discovered in the Hazárehjat: among these are coins of a type likely to excite some interest. . . .

The coins of Eucratides I., so numerously found at Beghrám, are not to be discovered at Jalálábád any more than those of Apollodotus and Menander, considering always a single specimen no evidence that coins of that species were once current there, but rather that they were not.

...

It may be noted that these two coins of Demetrius, the only ones, we believe, hitherto discovered,' have been elicited at Bukhará. Among the coins obtained by M. Honigberger at Bukhará, and which he thought worthy of enumeration, probably as being both Greek and silver ones, are transcribed in his memorandum,

1 Vasileos Antiochu.

1 Vasileos Dimitriu.

1 Vasileos Megalu Hiokraksu.

3 Vasileos Euthidimu.

5 Eucratides.

I have mentioned the discovery of a parcel of Bactrian drachmas and hemidrachmas in the Hazarahjat, which we purchased from a Hindú at Charrakár, who some three years since received them from a Hazárah. I have not yet been able to ascertain the spot, or under what circumstances these coins were found. The parcel, 120 in number, comprised seven quadrangular silver coins of Apollodotus, 108 silver coins of Menander, and five silver coins of Antimachus. The day preceding that on which this parcel of coins came into my possession, I received from the dashts of Beghrám, a silver coin of the last-named prince, Antimachus. The beauty of the coins of Antimachus, the excellence of their execution and designs, with the purity of the Greek characters of the legend, allow us not to place this prince subsequent to Eucratides, whose coins in these particulars they surpass. Among 5000 or more copper coins, procured from the dasht of Beghrám, we have not discovered one of Antimachus; and the detection of a single silver coin does not seem to afford evidence that he ruled there, when the absence of his copper coins seemed to prove that he did not.

EXTRACTS FROM THE THIRD MEMOIR ON THE ANCIENT COINS DISCOVERED AT THE SITE CALLED BEGHRAM, IN THE

KOHISTAN OF KABUL. BY C. MASSON.'

Two notices on the site of Beghrám, and of the nature of the coins found at it, have already been given. The collection of its antique treasures having been continued for three successive seasons, the results may be worthy of being presented in one view, both for exhibiting the exact state of discovery up to this time, and for

J.P.

There is a beautiful little Demetrius in the Ventura collection; see vol. iv.—

providing data on which to found inferences or to hazard conjectures on the curious and intricate subject of Bactrian history and antiquities.

It is not the object of this memoir to convey a full account of the present state of knowledge on these and other points, upon which, in truth, light is only beginning to dawn; but simply to narrate the fruits of our own labors, happy if they prove useful to those who, with superior advantages, and when sufficient materials are collected, will, no doubt, favor the world with some important work. We have, therefore, only to descant upon the coins found at Behgrám, and such, allied or connected with them, which may have been procured by ourselves in Afghánistán; and refrain, in the same spirit, from the delineation of any coins not actually found by us; and if such are alluded to, it is from necessity, and to direct attention to them.

The site of Beghrám, whatever its original name may have been, and whoever may have been its founder, yields evidence, from the coins found at it, of its existence as a city, which must, at least, have flourished from the epoch of Euthydemus, the king of Bactria, to that of the Muhammadan Khalifs-or for a period of nine hundred years. We have speculated on the probability of its pointing out the situation of Alexandria ad Caucasum, or Ad calcem Caucasi, and see no reason to change the opinion, viz., that the honor of being considered such, must be assigned to it, or to Níláb of Ghorband. The detection of a coin of one of the Antiochi may prove that it flourished prior to the age of Euthydemus, as it undoubtedly will have done; and certain Hindú Bráhmanical coins described as Class Brahmanical, may, perhaps, verify that it existed subsequently to the Muhammadan Khalífs, or to the duration of their sway in Afghánistán,-at all events, it would appear to have been destroyed, in whatever manner, before the era when coins with Persian legends became current in these regions; as our aggregate collection of nearly seven thousand coins from its site has not been contaminated with a single Persian coin, unless fig. 9 of the just noted Hindú series have a Persian legend, which may seem to intimate that the city's extinction was about the period of the introduction of the language, which may have been contemporaneous with the rise of the Muhammadan sovereignty of Ghazní. The coins of its princes have Persian legends, to prove which, we have inserted a silver coin of the celebrated Sultán Mahmúd: none of his coins or of his father, Sabaktagín, have been found at Beghrám, where those of the Khalifs so numerously occur.

Although Beghrám, inferring from the presence of topes or sepulchral monuments on its site and in its vicinity, may be supposed at some period to have been a capital, which its name testifies, it will generally have been only a provincial capital; and this is worthy of note, because there may be reason to suspect that many of the former rulers in these countries, particularly the Greek-Bactrian princes, had distinct provincial coinages. Certain coins of Apollodotus, Antilakides, Ermaios, and Eucratides seem to countenance the suspicion.

It is presumed that coins constantly found, and in number, on any known spot, afford proofs of their having once been current there, and that the princes whom they commemorate, whether as paramount or tributary sovereigns, held also authority at that spot. The numbers in which coins may be found, may, perhaps, furnish a criterion upon which we may calculate,-first, generally, the duration of the dynasties denoted by the various types of coins; and next, particularly, that of the reign of each individual prince. A collection of one year would not furnish this criterion; a

Of the Rajput, or 'bull and horseman' group.-J.P.

collection of many years might, -a statement is therefore annexed of the numbers in which the several descriptions of coins found at Beghrám have, during three years, been obtained; -and if it be seen that they are found annually in due numerical proportion, it may be of service in our speculations, assisted by the coins themselves. Indeed, of the recorded kings of Bactria, the coins are found in just the numbers we might expect, and confirm what we know as to the length of their reigns; and in some other instances of unrecorded princes, their coins and the frequency or rarity of their occurrence corroborate the conjectures as to the extent of their reigns, which other accidental discoveries seem to authorise.

The coins of Beghrám fortunately admit of ready classification, and may be reduced to five grand classes-I. Greek-Bactrian; II. Indo-Scythic or Mithraic; III. Ancient Persian, whether Parthian or Sassanian; IV. Hindú or Brahmanical; V. Kufic or Muhammadan. The last class may chronologically be entitled to stand before its predecessor, the Bráhmanical one.

ENUMERATION OF COINS COLLECTED FROM BEGHRÁM DURING THE YEARS 1833, 1834, AND 1835.

It is a very remarkable circumstance that none of the coins of Azos, which were so numerous in the Ventura collection from the Panjáb, should have been met with at Beghrám.-J.P.

Beghrám has not yielded one coin of the Arsacidæ, or one coin that we dare positively to affirm to be Parthian.2 Coins with the Sassanian symbols on the reverse, or the distinguishing fire-altar, are very numerous; but it may be questioned whether they are coins of the Sassanidæ of Persia, and whether they may not rather refer to distinct princes, that we believe Persian authentic history attests to have flourished in these countries, as at Zabulistán, etc.

1 [ Pl. iii., vol. v., 'Jour. As. Soc. Beng.'; 'Ariana Antiqua.' xvi., 18, 19, 20.] 2 [One doubtful one is noticed at p. 546, 'Jour. As. Soc. Beng.', vol. v.]

XII.-NEW VARIETIES OF BACTRIAN COINS, ENGRAVED AS Pl. XXVIII., FROM MASSON'S DRAWINGS AND OTHER SOURCES.

(SEPTEMBER, 1836.)

Instead of pursuing Masson's recapitulation of all the coins hitherto found by himself at Beghrám, we have preferred selecting those only which were new in name or type, for illustration; on the present occasion confining ourselves to those bearing Greek inscriptions of the earlier class, and leaving the Mithraic, of which our author produces some highly interesting novelties, for a subsequent plate.

Fig. 1. A silver coin of Archelius, similar in character to the coins of Menander and Apollodotus.'

OBVERSE.-Bust of king; head bound with fillet or diadem; legend ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ (δικα) 1ΟΥ ΝΙΚΗΦΟΡΟΥ ΑΡΧΕΛΙΟΥ. [ΑΡΧΕΒΙΟΥ.]

The

REVERSE. Jupiter Tonans, seated, holding sceptre in left hand. Compound monogram: legend in the Bactro-Pehlví character. name is faint in the drawing, but is read with confidence by Masson from the coin itself. It may be read A'lakiyo (or jo); but if the second and third letters can be made kali, the word will represent very tolerably the pronunciation of the Greek name, A'kaliyo. The equivalent for Niknpopov is an old acquaintance, Ajalado; but the middle letter is altered in form. The remaining epithet P, which I have supposed to be represented in the Greek by dikalov, is, in fact, found standing for this title, the just,' [Dhamikasa] in a coin of

1 Col. Stacy writes, while we are correcting this proof, that he has just added another name to this group, ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ ΝΙΚΑΤΟΡΟΣ ΑΜΥΝΤ. . . . but of this we are promised casts in a day or two: it is too late for the present plate.